Important security note: Warning of attempted fraud in the name of DWS
We have detected that fraudulent individuals are misusing the "DWS" trademark and the names of DWS employees on the internet and social media. These fraudsters are operating fake websites, Facebook pages, WhatsApp groups and Mobile Apps. Please be aware that DWS does not have any Facebook Ambassador profiles or WhatsApp chats. If you receive any unexpected calls, messages, or emails claiming to be from DWS, exercise caution and do not make any payments or disclose personal information. We encourage you to report any suspicious activity to info@dws.com, including any relevant documents and the original fraudulent email. Additionally, if you believe you have been a victim of fraud, please notify your local authorities and take steps to protect yourself.
8/19/2026
After months of back-and-forth between the Senate and the House, the two chambers reached an agreement in late June on a comprehensive bipartisan housing package, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act.[1] The law became effective July 11 after President Donald Trump neither signed nor vetoed the legislation within the prescribed 10-day review period.[2] There is broad recognition now both by the White House and lawmakers, in an overwhelming majority, that private capital has a very big role to play for a component of the American population that wants to rent a home.[1]
National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), representing rental housing providers and millions of residents, described the Act as “the most important housing legislation in a generation”.[3] NMHC believes the law will modernize federal housing programs, reduce barriers to development and encourage the production and preservation of more housing nationwide. According to NMHC, the law will help communities expand housing supply, improve affordability and create more pathways to both rental housing and homeownership.
The law is a broad bipartisan housing reform package, but its most discussed provision bars a "large institutional investor," defined in the statute as an entity that owns at least 350 single-family homes, from purchasing additional single-family homes.[4] This applies to existing single-family homes (two or fewer dwelling units).[4] While buying additional existing single-family homes on the open market is banned, the institutional acquisition of new homes is permitted.[5] Homebuilders can sell inventory in for-sale communities to
institutional investors without limitation.[5] Institutional build-to-rent* owners, operators, and developers are not subject to the investment ban.[5] We conclude the law targets institutions competing with first-time homebuyers on existing for-sale inventory, not institutions adding new supply.
In a pivot toward new construction, the law creates incentives and financing tools that target housing supply, community development and Opportunity Zone multifamily — with multiple carve-outs for build-to-rent and other strategies that add new inventory.[6] We believe these carve-outs matter because housing affordability is ultimately a supply problem.
Implications:
In our view, the legislation provides important clarity for investors, lenders and industry participants while reinforcing the distinction between build-to-rent housing and the acquisition of existing for-sale homes. The legislation acknowledges that limiting investment in the construction of built-to-rent housing does not create more homes for sale; it results in fewer homes being built altogether.
Dallas B. Tanner, the CEO of Invitation Homes, the nation’s largest single-family rental landlord, said that the recently passed housing bill that bans investors like him from buying existing homes will eventually lower home prices over the medium to long term, it will not have an immediate impact.[7] He emphasized that the law’s main effect is on deregulation and capital flow, not a direct price drop.
New Law Changes the Playbook:
While the law aims to limit large-scale investor purchases of existing single-family homes, we maintain it preserves activities essential to building and maintaining housing supply. We expect institutional investors will likely move into carve-out categories that add new rental inventory such as build-to-rent, rent-to-renovate or certain homeownership-boost programs.
Institutional owners of single-family rentals have more than doubled the number of homes they have been bringing to market since February, a shift that offers an early read on how Wall Street is repositioning in response to Washington's new buying ban.[8] Given where U.S. home prices are, some of this is likely at-tributed to shifts in strategy — accumulate high dollar values off of top U.S. home values by culling underperforming assets and redirect that capital towards growth areas, i.e., build-to-rent, for example. For commercial real estate executives watching the single-family rental sector, this implies that policy risk is now translating into portfolio pruning, price flexibility and a renewed push into development-heavy strategies.
*Defining Built-to-Rent: DWS defines build-to-rent communities as purpose-built residential developments designed from the ground up for long-term rental occupancy, rather than for sale to homeowners. Unlike scattered single-family rentals, they are typically master-planned, professionally managed neighborhoods that combine the form and scale of a suburban subdivision with the management and operational structure of a multifamily asset.