Market IQ | Political and capital market insights

Access to thought-provoking views from DWS thought leaders can help investors identify and interpret trends and events influencing the markets and investment decisions.

Insights to help better inform portfolio construction decisions

Our Multi-Asset Investment Committee (MIC) brings together our multi-asset team members and other leaders across global asset classes, to develop portfolio solutions and robust investment outlooks that take into account a variety of market scenarios. The MIC utilizes the DWS global investment platform in order to cultivate investment ideas for the entire organization—and our clients.

Investment and research professionals

900

Each specializing in specific alpha sources, to generate a broad set of value-adding ideas through proprietary research

Signal providers

>50

Give an independent investment recommendation on their respective chief investment office (CIO) signal based on the investment and research professionals' idea and research

Asset classes

4+1

Fixed income, equities, alternatives, multi-asset + macroeconomic

Meet our tenured U.S. Multi-Asset Investment Committee

David-Bianco.jpg
David Bianco
Chief Investment Officer, Americas
Based in: New York
John Vojticek
John Vojticek
Head and Chief Investment Officer of Liquid Real Assets
Based in: Chicago
Darwei Kung
Darwei Kung
Portfolio Manager for Commodities
Based in: New York
Greg Staples
George Catrambone
Head of Fixed Income, North America
Based in: New York

Note team changes: U.S. Liquid Real Assets now includes Multi-Asset Solutions, effective 4/25/23.

 

Macro environment

 
JasonChen

Jason Chen, Contributor

Timely investment outlooks and relevant allocation recommendations

U.S. MIC positions for potential rising interest rates and continued elevated inflation

 

In the fourth quarter of 2023, the global economy continued to demonstrate resiliency amid a persistently tight monetary policy environment. Wage growth in the US continues to be quite strong, and unemployment rates continue to imply tightness in the labor market. Consumer price inflation has also remained above the Fed’s target, reflecting in the Fed’s continued hesitancy to cut interest rates. Despite these robust economic conditions, interest rates experienced some normalization in Q4, with US Treasury yields rallying back to June levels.

After a volatile summer, global equity markets resumed their strong performance in Q4, driven by robust earnings growth and strong momentum across technology and growth companies. The S&P 500 and the MSCI All Country World returned 11.7% and 11.2%, respectively, capping off a strong year for global equity returns. International equity market returns were strongly positive as well, with developed and emerging markets returning 10.4% and 7.9%, respectively.

Fixed income markets experienced strong returns as both interest rates and credit spreads rallied in Q4. For the quarter, the Bloomberg US Treasury Index and the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index both returned 5.7% and 8.5%, respectively, reflecting some normalization in interest rates. The Bloomberg US High Yield index generated returns of 7.2%, with credit spreads experiencing a strong rally in Q4.

Heading into 2024, we see a gradual slowdown in the global economy. Labor tightness should keep core inflation sticky while elevated policy rates should weigh on housing and consumer credit.

Portfolio positioning

We enter Q4 underweight risk assets, reflecting a slowdown in the US economy and corresponding weakness in corporate earnings. In our view, US equity prices are quite demanding particularly given market expectations of higher interest rates for longer. The combination for potential weakness in corporate profitability combined with elevated discount creates a potentially challenging environment for equities in the immediate term.

Across global equities, we are underweight the US, neutral on Europe, and overweight on Japan and the Emerging Markets. These 2 regions trade at much less demanding valuations relative to the US. Japan in particular is also showing signs of structural economic improvements, as well as improvements in corporate governance and shareholder friendliness.”

We are neutral fixed income with a preference for TIPS and Securitized credit and a modest underweight to international sovereigns.

We are modestly overweight alternatives with a preference for natural resource equities and infrastructure.

DWS allocation views for dynamic portfolio construction

Our investment ideas include broad and targeted solutions that we believe are well positioned for the current market environment. As of 12/31/23, the U.S. MIC portfolios were underweight equities, neutral fixed income and slightly overweight alternatives, which reflects our global macroeconomic outlook.

Legend:

U.S. MIC

Benchmark allocation


Asset type Region Asset class U.S. MIC vs benchmark allocations Broad solutions Targeted solutions
Equity total
55.00
58.50
Equity Developed markets U.S. large caps
34.50
37.00
U.S. small caps
1.50
4.00
European equities
5.50
8.00
Japanese equities
4.00
3.00
Asia Pacific ex-Japan equities
1.50
1.50
Emerging
markets
Emerging market equities
6.00
5.00


Emerging markets Asia equities
2.00
0.00
Fixed income total
31.75
31.50
Fixed income U.S. U.S. Treasuries
7.00
7.00


U.S. TIPS
1.00
0.00
U.S. securitized bonds
6.75
6.00
U.S. investment-grade corporates
8.00
8.00
U.S. high yield bonds
3.50
3.50
Non-U.S. developed Global ex-U.S. developed bonds
2.50
4.50


Emerging
markets
Global emerging-markets bonds
3.00
2.50
Alternatives total
11.50
10.00
Alternatives
 
Global Natural Resources
1.00
0.00
Global Commodities
1.00
1.50
Global Infrastructure
3.50
2.50
Global Developed real estate
1.00
6.00
U.S. Real estate/REITs
5.00
0.00
Cash total
1.75
0.00
100.0

Allocations are subject to change. Please note certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Due to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions made in our analysis, actual events or results or the actual performance of the markets may differ materially from those described. The information herein reflect our current views only, are subject to change, and are not intended to be promissory or relied upon by the reader. There can be no certainty that events will turn out as we have opined herein.

Legend:

U.S. MIC

Benchmark allocation


Asset type Region Asset class U.S. MIC vs benchmark allocations Broad solutions Targeted solutions
Equity total
32.00
38.50
Equity Developed markets U.S. large caps
20.00
24.50
U.S. small caps
1.00
2.50
European equities
2.50
5.00
Japanese equities
2.50
2.00
Asia Pacific ex-Japan equities
1.00
1.00
Emerging
markets
Emerging market equities
3.50
3.50


Emerging markets Asia equities
1.50
0.00
Fixed income total
57.50
56.50
Fixed income U.S. U.S. Treasuries
11.00
11.00


U.S. TIPS
2.00
0.00
U.S. securitized bonds
12.50
11.00
U.S. investment-grade corporates
14.00
14.00
U.S. high yield bonds
6.00
6.00
Non-U.S. developed Global ex-U.S. developed bonds
5.50
9.00


Emerging
markets
Global emerging-markets bonds
6.50
5.50
Alternatives total
6.00
5.00
Alternatives
 
Global Natural Resources
0.50
0.00
Global Commodities
1.00
1.00
Global Infrastructure
1.50
1.00
Global Developed real estate
0.50
3.00
U.S. Real estate/REITs
2.50
0.00
Cash total
4.50
0.00
100.0

Allocations are subject to change. Please note certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Due to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions made in our analysis, actual events or results or the actual performance of the markets may differ materially from those described. The information herein reflect our current views only, are subject to change, and are not intended to be promissory or relied upon by the reader. There can be no certainty that events will turn out as we have opined herein.

Legend:

U.S. MIC

Benchmark allocation


Asset type Region Asset class U.S. MIC vs benchmark allocations Broad solutions Targeted solutions
Equity total
76.00
80.50
Equity Developed markets U.S. large caps
48.00
51.00
U.S. small caps
2.00
5.50
European equities
7.50
11.00
Japanese equities
5.50
4.00
Asia Pacific ex-Japan equities
2.00
2.00
Emerging
markets
Emerging market equities
8.50
7.00


Emerging markets Asia equities
2.50
0.00
Fixed income total
13.00
13.00
Fixed income U.S. U.S. Treasuries
2.50
2.50


U.S. TIPS
0.50
0.00
U.S. securitized bonds
3.00
2.50
U.S. investment-grade corporates
4.00
4.00
U.S. high yield bonds
2.50
2.50
Non-U.S. developed Global ex-U.S. developed bonds
0.50
1.50


Emerging
markets
Global emerging-markets bonds
0.00
0.00
Alternatives total
7.00
6.50
Alternatives
 
Global Natural Resources
0.50
0.00
Global Commodities
0.50
1.00
Global Infrastructure
2.00
1.50
Global Developed real estate
1.00
4.00
U.S. Real estate/REITs
3.00
0.00
Cash total
4.00
0.00
100.0

Allocations are subject to change. Please note certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Due to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions made in our analysis, actual events or results or the actual performance of the markets may differ materially from those described. The information herein reflect our current views only, are subject to change, and are not intended to be promissory or relied upon by the reader. There can be no certainty that events will turn out as we have opined herein.

Market analysis

Recent market volatility has reflected uncertainty in both economic and market conditions going forward. Global central bank policy, for the most part, has sharply pivoted toward quantitative tightening and interest rate hikes, with strong commitment from the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) to prioritize the stemming of inflationary pressures even at the expense of economic activity. Looking out over the coming years, a couple of key questions remain

    1.  What are the implications of quantitative tightening on real interest rates, and how might this affect equity valuations?
    2.  How will slowing economic activity impact what has thus far been a resilient corporate earnings outlook?
    3. Has investor sentiment declined significantly enough to indicate the potential for a strong risk-on rally if macroeconomic and interest rate continues stabilize?
    4. Will inflationary pressures persist, or is the worst behind us?

1. The great liquidity unwind


Since the global financial crisis, global monetary, and more recently, fiscal, policy has lent unprecedented support for economic growth and the stability of financial assets. The growth of the Fed balance sheet reached its apex of nearly $9tr in 2022 following renewed dovish policy in reaction to the COVID-19 crisis. As inflationary pressures have persisted beyond where the Fed previously anticipated, Chairman Powell has pivoted dramatically toward a restrictive policy, including quantitative tightening. Going forward, the Fed balance sheet reduction is expected to be $95bn per month, which is to be achieved not by an outright sale of assets, but rather a change in the rate of reinvestment.

Exhibit 1: US Condition of All Federal Reserve Banks Total Assets ($ millions)


Entering a cycle of significant quantitative tightening and a torrid pace of interest rate hikes, investors are left to question what level of real interest rate is expected to prevail when the economy is operating at its full sustainable level. Establishing a stable long-term discount rate is an integral step for fundamental investors to determine the steady state multiple and fair value on risk assets.

In addition to the significant liquidity injections the Fed has provided since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), fiscal stimulus has also played an important role in stabilizing recent periods of market volatility. Looking at the COVID-19 crisis between 2020 and 2022, the total fiscal stimulus amounted to 2.6 times the size of the stimulus provided during the 2008 credit crisis as a percentage of the GDP and played an important role in the historically rapid pace of economic and market recovery. Given the high likelihood of a divided government post the midterm elections, it is unlikely that an additional fiscal stimulus package beyond the recent Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 will be passed to dampen the extent of an economic downturn.


Exhibit 2: Fiscal stimulus as a percentage of GDP


What does this mean for equity markets? In recent years, equity valuations have been supported at elevated levels in part due to low and often negative real interest rates. As the discount rate rose dramatically in recent months, equity multiples have commensurately moved lower. Should the level of real interest rates find stability at the current level, volatility around equity valuations may also subside. Exhibit 3 shows that, particularly when combined with measures of market uncertainty such as the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, more commonly referred to as the VIX, the level of the 10yr real treasury yield has done a good job of explaining the forward price-to-earnings multiple of the US equity market.


Exhibit 3: S&P 500 NTM PEs versus model of 10yr real yields and VIX Index

Exhibit-3.png

Source: Factset, CBOE, DWS Calculations as of 10/11/2022


2. Have earnings peaked?

In addition to the change in liquidity conditions, the sustainability of current margin levels remains a question. Despite significant price pressures, corporations have continued to generate record earnings, maintaining pricing power across many segments of the economy. Exhibit 4 shows that both defensive and cyclical markets alike in Europe are still trading near or at peak earnings per share.

Exhibit 4: MSCI Europe Cyclical and Defensive Distance from Historical Peak in EPS (%)

While the current peak in earnings across both defensive and cyclical segments of the equity markets does not necessarily indicate an ensuing decline in corporate earnings, history suggests it is likely that the behavior in market prices as well as the slowing macroeconomic growth outlook would lead to downward revisions in the outlook for corporate earnings over the next few quarters.

Comparing the behavior of the S&P 500 to its underlying 12-month forward earnings outlook, we can draw some parallels to the market selloffs in 2008 and during the onset the COVID-19 crisis in early 2020. As with those scenarios, we see a divergence between falling equity levels and what appear to be still stable and, in some cases, rising earnings outlooks. There is a lead-lag relation where the market appears to anticipate declines in earnings not yet reflected in consensus estimates.

Similarly, the inflection point in S&P 500 prices in 2009 preceded the reversal in corporate earnings forecasts by a few months. The recovery in 2020, which was historically fast, also began ahead of the turnaround in corporate profits. In this kind of macroeconomic backdrop, positive earnings momentum is difficult to sustain as economic activity is slowing and leading economic indicators such as ISM New Orders which have been a strong leading indicator of S&P 500 forward EPS are approaching contraction levels (<50).

Exhibit 5: MSCI USA 12m Fwd EPS vs equity price

US MA Quarterly Commentary graph images_Chart 1_R1.svg

Chart 2.svg

Source: Bloomberg, Factset as of 9/12/2022

Historically speaking, this anticipated earnings decline is a reasonable expectation given choppy macroeconomic conditions, particularly as interest rates are moving higher. Earnings are difficult to sustain momentum as economic activity is slowing. In general, economic indicators such as ISM New Orders have been a strong leading indicator of S&P 500 forward EPS.

Exhibit 6: ISM Manufacturing New Orders versus MSCI USA 12m Forward EPS

US MA Quarterly Commentary graph images_Chart 3_R1.svg

Source: Bloomberg, Institute for Supply Management, DWS Calculations as of 9/121/2022


3. Could a reversal in market sentiment help propel a recovery in risk assets?


While we agree that investors are right to anticipate a decline in corporate earnings, depressed investor sentiment leaves the potential for positive surprises and for rebalancing back into equities to act as a tailwind for risk markets. Across various measures of invest positioning such as Bank of America’s Fund Manager Survey, multi-asset investors are significantly underweight equities relative to their benchmarks. Any potential reversal in these underweights would be a strong tailwind for risk assets.

The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) indices, which survey investors on their outlook for the stock market over the next 6 months, also show unusually depressed market sentiments. The 4-week moving average differential between the percentage of survey participants with a bullish outlook versus those with a bearish outlook (58.1% and 20.5%, respectively), is among the most negative points in the history of the indices.

Exhibit 7: AAII Sentiment Bullish readings minus Bearish readings 4-week moving average (%)

AMG223198_DWS US MA Quarterly Commentary_Chart 2_R1.svg

Source: American Association of Individual Investors, Bloomberg as of 10/12/20222


4. Has inflation peaked?


While it’s difficult to predict the degree to which inflation will normalize over the coming quarters, we do see some evidence when looking at leading indicators across segments of the consumer price basket. For example, after peaking in May of this year, the S&P GSCI Grains price index, which leads the food and beverage CPI component, has declined over 20%. Similarly, while housing prices have remained stubbornly resilient in the face of slowing economic growth and significantly higher mortgage interest rates, expectations around the change in apartment rental prices—historically a more timely indicator of changes in housing conditions—have showed sights of slowing. Exhibit 8 shows the change in both median new home prices and expected apartment rental prices over the next year.

Exhibit 8: Median new home prices and apartment average rental price change expectations over the next 12 months

AMG223198_DWS US MA Quarterly Commentary_Chart 3_R1.svg

Source: Bloomberg,as of 8/31/2022

Market-based measures of forward-looking inflation have also come down considerably since peaking in March of this year. Across the treasury inflation protection breakeven curve, inflation breakevens have moderated significantly, perhaps indicating that market participants believe the Fed’s aggressive actions and guidance on interest rate hikes and quantitative tightening will be sufficient to help stabilize prices. Exhibit 9 shows the decline in the 2yr, 5yr, and 10yr TIPS breakeven levels from earlier in the year.

Exhibit 9: TIPS inflation breakevens

AMG223198_DWS US MA Quarterly Commentary_Chart 1_R1.svg

Source: Bloomberg as of 10/10/2022

With a lower neutral level on real interest rates (or the discount rate), steady state equity multiples would be meaningfully higher, justifying higher equity prices even amid a moderate decline in corporate profits. Should inflationary pressures continue to show signs of slowing, our view on equity markets would be increasingly constructive.


Key points-

      1. As the Fed engages in interest rate hikes and quantitative tightening, stability in the real interest rate will be important for investors to determine fair equity valuations
      2. Forward looking equity earnings expectations are not a leading indicator. The stock market decline and the slowing in economic data is historically anticipatory of earnings declines.
      3. Investor sentiment is at depressed levels, where positive catalysts over the coming quarters may drive asymmetric upside in equity markets
      4. While inflation is expected to persist, components of inflation have shown signs of slowing. Further, market pricing of inflation via TIPS breakevens shows a belief that the Fed’s actions and guidance may be sufficient to keep inflation under wraps over the next few years.

Equities

Across global equities, we are underweight the US, neutral on Europe, and overweight on Japan and the Emerging Markets.

Equities

Fixed income

We are neutral fixed income with a preference for TIPS and Securitized credit and a modest underweight to International sovereigns.

Fixed income

Alternatives

We are modestly overweight alternatives with a preference for natural resource equities and infrastructure.

Alternatives

Additional resources

CIO View