i

Important security note: Warning of attempted fraud in the name of DWS

We have detected that fraudulent individuals are misusing the "DWS" trademark and the names of DWS employees on the internet and social media. These fraudsters are operating fake websites, Facebook pages, and WhatsApp groups. Please be aware that DWS does not have any Facebook Ambassador profiles or WhatsApp chats. If you receive any unexpected calls, messages, or emails claiming to be from DWS, exercise caution and do not make any payments or disclose personal information. We encourage you to report any suspicious activity to info@dws.com, including any relevant documents and the original fraudulent email. Additionally, if you believe you have been a victim of fraud, please notify your local authorities and take steps to protect yourself.

Housing Affordability Review – 2024

Alternatives
Real Estate

12/11/2024

Mapping Residential Rental Affordability around the World        

Simon Wallace

Global Co-Head of Real Estate Research

Martin

Martin Lippmann

Head of Real Estate Research, Europe

Friedenauer Hhe_Quellenangabe_FHP Friedenauer Hhe Projekt GmbH

IN A NUTSHELL

  • Rental affordability, evaluated as rents in relation to incomes and post-rent spending power, varies significantly across the 75 global markets we analysed. The top position is taken by Salt Lake City, closely followed by Austin, Texas. At the other end of the spectrum stand Mumbai, Beijing and New York as some of the most expensive markets globally.
  • On a regional level, US markets are generally more affordable, with six out of the top ten markets being located in the US, including San Francisco. However, New York or Miami are notable exceptions, ranking as significantly less affordable.
  • European markets show mixed results. Major cities like London, Paris, Berlin or Amsterdam are among the most expensive globally, while smaller markets like Stuttgart and Lyon, but also Munich, were judged affordable.
  • APAC is generally the least affordable region. Chinese and Indian cities are stretched, while Tokyo and Singapore also rank low in affordability. A notable exception in the region are Australian cities, including Sydney.

 

1 / Introduction

Global Residential Affordability

 

Necessity for life

Throughout human history, “housing” has been a basic need, irreplaceable by other means. Industrialization and mass urbanization forever changed the way people lived. Growing populations, supply-demand imbalances, rising costs, the question of housing and housing affordability has, since this point, rarely been out of the public consciousness. Often viewed from a national perspective, these concerns repeat across the globe.

Drawing comparisons between cities is difficult, and unlikely to provide comfort to those struggling with the cost of housing. But for real estate investors it is an important question, providing insight into both the risks and the opportunities across different residential markets.

Rental focus

There is no one definition of housing affordability, but in this analysis, we look at it from a rental perspective, as opposed to the cost of ownership and the servicing of a mortgage.

While owner occupation is the prevalent form of housing globally, rental accommodation is gaining traction in many markets, accounting for an increasingly large share of institutional real estate investment portfolios.

Post Global Financial Crisis (GFC), reduced access to financing as well as an increased desire for flexibility have driven more people towards rental accommodation. Exacerbated in recent years by rising interest rates and a reduction in available rental accommodation, rental pressures have continued to mount, further elevating affordability concerns.

Sharply rising rents may benefit owners in the short-term, but over a sustained period a market that has become unaffordable could be at risk of increased income volatility – with tenants less able to absorb personal and economic shocks – as well as government intervention – increasingly common over recent years.

Given the growing prevalence of rental accommodation within institutional portfolios, alongside the event challenges in rental affordability that have emerged since the GFC, our analysis has focused on rental accommodation, comparing measures of affordability across major global cities. To monitor the progression of global affordability, we will look to revisit this analysis on an annual basis.

Measuring affordability

Housing affordability is a difficult indicator to measure, as it depends on many aspects across a multitude of individual households.

Cost-of-living measures are broad in their definition [1] while overburden rates often do not distinguish between type of occupation, including rental and owner occupier households and including all payments associated with housing.[2]

In this analysis we have used two measures. The first of which, a rental affordability ratio, refers to tenants alone and is defined as the proportion of median household income after tax spent on net rent, with a ratio of 30% often seen as the maximum threshold for affordability.[3]

The second approach considers residual spending power, measured as the dollar value of household disposable income after rental payments, stated as purchasing power parity (PPP).[4]

 

 

Housing Affordability Review – 2024
Click here to download the full article